SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Pluvia vs. Westergaard
An SI Board Since August 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1267 13 0
Emcee:  JEFF CHAPMAN Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1092 George, I'm not totally sure, but that raises an VERY interesting point. FoThomas G. Busillo-9/6/1997
1091 WH, right back at ya - nice synopsis <g> CNET right now has a really funnThomas G. Busillo-9/6/1997
1090 Tom, if a person discovers what is true non-public information and post it to aaknahow-9/6/1997
1089 Tom, good synopsis of the legal aspects involved. I totally agree with you abouWendell Holmes-9/6/1997
1088 Correction: the coffee just hit me...it's the SEC Act of 1934 (not 1935)...Thomas G. Busillo-9/6/1997
1087 David, I'd sort of break your question down into three separate components:Thomas G. Busillo-9/6/1997
1086 NASDAQ has been a member for some time, I read his posts from time to time. WelBill Jackson-9/6/1997
1085 >>The new Nasdaq device, ...searching for price-sensitive information whiDMaA-9/5/1997
1084 Have you guys seen this? biz.yahoo.comNight Writer-9/5/1997
1083 Thomas; I see your point, why should we get rich, we have enough money already,Bill Jackson-9/5/1997
1082 Wendell, Yes they are all prefrothed at the mouth, ready to defend to the clienBill Jackson-9/5/1997
1081 Interesting news article : news.comSly_-9/5/1997
1080 Sorry, Westergaard is not that smart. What triggers or activates the banner isaknahow-9/5/1997
1079 George, Thanks for the response, Steve Pluvia will be most interested in this Noneyet-9/5/1997
1078 Thomas, did Westergaard benefit? Good question. Bear with this response a bitaknahow-9/5/1997
1077 Wendell, Your response is also needed on the new thread !!! Link below. exchaNoneyet-9/5/1997
1076 Bill, it's actually "front running" an order. Now you're messWendell Holmes-9/5/1997
1075 Bill, You are missing the point. Nasdaq must first address the important issueNoneyet-9/5/1997
1074 Tom, good points about Nasdaq. This is merely another service of the NASD to trWendell Holmes-9/5/1997
1073 Bill- Bingo! <eom> TarzanTarzan-9/5/1997
1072 Ron, Thanks, the new thread regarding the Nasdaq bit is now started: Subject Done, gone.-9/5/1997
1071 Bounced, you want to create your own thread? easy to do. Go to subject categoryKip518-9/5/1997
1070 Thomas; If NASDAQ wants to find real crooks join the "get rid of the fractBill Jackson-9/5/1997
1069 Black Dahlia, I really think that the NASDAQ thing needs it's own thread. Done, gone.-9/5/1997
1068 This whole matter caught my eye back on 8/20 or 8/21; I didn't know Steve PKen Merwin-9/5/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News