SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
12933Not all Europe’s ‘right-wingers’ fit the hackneyed profile the press and poliLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12932Archdiocese paid legal bills for accused priests ‘Financial assistance’ renLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12931If he ever wants to get anything done he would! <<GG>>>sandintoes-5/13/2002
12930<i>"God is Beneficent and there is evidence of that in scripture and Lazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12929Carter's statement, that Cuba does not have any biological weapons, is increMachaon-5/13/2002
12928<i>If I am dying of thirst and you take my last $100.00, in exchange for aSolon-5/13/2002
12927But at least I've done it. I had a neighbor who was so afraid of fire he bIsh-5/13/2002
12926Christ! I have done that perhaps a dozen times in my life. Probably 2 or 3 of Solon-5/13/2002
12925<i>"I just asked a question. You have not answered it, and your earliSolon-5/13/2002
12924<i>"I was laughing at you. And you continue to dig the hole deeper<Solon-5/13/2002
12923Carter is the A-hole responsible for the nuclear waste mess. Carter directed thZoltan!-5/13/2002
12922Carter is quite the idiot. He is given a tour of "one" biotech facilitMachaon-5/13/2002
12921You're WAY BEHIND, fella. Those Mesoamericans discovered that a long, long Lazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12920Couldn't Have Said It Better Myself Dept. WHAT THEY THINK OF AMERICA: A stiLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12919Of course. Anyone who knows Jimmy Carter knows that he is a mean, petty man.Zoltan!-5/13/2002
12918Ever burned your yard? It works. Let it get up to 5-6 inches in the fall and jusIsh-5/13/2002
12917He's a fraud too. This nice guy routine is nauseating. What a totally despicBill-5/13/2002
12916LIBERAL INTOLERANCE WATCH: Not Howell Raines this time, but a course at BerkeleLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12915Dems always cozy up to dictators, especially Jimmy Carter, a total failure and dZoltan!-5/13/2002
12914What do we do if they break that oath? Impeach 'em? :-)Lazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12913We need to change the presidential oath of office to include an oath of non partBill-5/13/2002
12912Carter backs Cuba on bioweapons Former President Carter greets CLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12911<i>Even JLA takes exception to the occasional GOP policy or practitioner. Lazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12910I see Jimmy Carter is making a complete ass of himself today down in Havana. CasBill-5/13/2002
12909With chili you get gas as well.... How approrpriate to compare flatulence to cajlallen-5/13/2002
12908LOL. They'll both give you heartburn--one from excess richness and the otheLane3-5/13/2002
12907Puh-leeze..... Comparing Noonan to CarVILE is like comparing Fettucini Alfredo jlallen-5/13/2002
12906The more common definition of partisan as an adjective is: devoted to or biased Bill-5/13/2002
12905<i>" You travel around, and on every hilltop you see someone slashingLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12904<i>I guess when the media demonizes these guys so much</i> Which reLane3-5/13/2002
12903<i>I usually picture partisans as attack dogs, Ms. Noonan is too elegant aLane3-5/13/2002
12902Message 17461253 meant this one for you.one_less-5/13/2002
12901making mistakes....OK but feel free to interrupt your enemy when they are makingone_less-5/13/2002
12900Interesting that Peggy Noonan rated highest among Republican partisans. She doesTom Clarke-5/13/2002
12899Krugman used to be a business writer. I really never noticed a partisan bent, aLane3-5/13/2002
12898Andrew Sullivan andrewsullivan.com has a bunch of good stuff on Fortuyn and the Tom Clarke-5/13/2002
12897It's a pretty neat site. I enjoy the dispatches from Croatia, news from therTom Clarke-5/13/2002
12896In their minds, there is no far left. The guy who killed Fortuyn was a "chaTom Clarke-5/13/2002
12895Friedman sounds uncharacteristically reactionary in this piece. How can satellitTom Clarke-5/13/2002
12894I've seen that weblog. (Not ready to say blog yet) Andrew Sullivan had a linTom Clarke-5/13/2002
12893<i>"You cannot attach a quality to nullity."</i> If someoone_less-5/13/2002
12892The article indicates that the nature and degree and effects of what is now happE-5/13/2002
12891You've probably already seen this. If not, take a look. Ranking the Big-TiLane3-5/13/2002
12890And the problem is? Slash and burn agriculture is common in the tropics. In YuLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12889Edit: change "legal" to "lethal". Lawyers on the brain.Lazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12888I just asked a question. You have not answered it, and your earlier reference toNeocon-5/13/2002
12887If there are competitive bids, that is all that is necessary to satisfy the demaNeocon-5/13/2002
12886Uh huh......Neocon-5/13/2002
12885Solon, your quote proves nothing. It involved one plant, and the opinion that itNeocon-5/13/2002
12884news.bbc.co.uk OT, and what can one say about it anyway? : <<An African E-5/13/2002
12883LOL! Thanks old pal... JLAjlallen-5/13/2002
12882<i>Some of my beliefs are extremely conservative</i> Yeah. Solon beLazarus_Long-5/13/2002
12881Nope. A general observation....jlallen-5/13/2002
12880LOL... "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Nsandintoes-5/13/2002
12879"You previously defined perfect charity as an act; now you are defining chaSolon-5/13/2002
12878Do you think that every remark against fools and idiots is about you, Dunce-CapSolon-5/13/2002
12877<i>I have a very high regard for JLA. There might be a very good reason whjttmab-5/13/2002
12876Part time philosopher. Some of the best ones were also mathematicians. Some werejttmab-5/13/2002
12875Just who the F--- do you think you are, bub?jlallen-5/13/2002
12874<I>Would God want jla for company? </I> I have a very high regard fBill-5/13/2002
12873Edit: Sorry...decided to put it on a different thread.jttmab-5/13/2002
12872Typically demolib pinheadish response...jlallen-5/13/2002
12871Whatever. Now why would anyone find that objectionable? Unless...awe never mind,one_less-5/13/2002
12870<i>I like to think that humans return as humans since I may not have all mjttmab-5/13/2002
12869ROTFLMAO!!!!!! Uh, yeah. And you and I are in trouble.Lazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12868<i>"Who from the thread WOULD he pick?"</i> He, assuminaverage joe-5/12/2002
12867<i>Would God give us 'another chance' to get it right by placing tbearshark-5/12/2002
12866<i>This insures that the 'believers' continue to donate only to thLazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12865<i>The Muslims don't consider the Pope an option either.</i> Qujttmab-5/12/2002
12864The Muslims don't consider the Pope an option either.Lazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12863<i>But suppose he's Allah? Or Zeus?</i> Then the Christians [orjttmab-5/12/2002
12862But suppose he's Allah? Or Zeus?Lazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12861<i>Who from the thread WOULD he pick?</i> We can't tell who He jttmab-5/12/2002
12860OK. Since we're into it.... Who from the thread WOULD he pick?Lazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12859<i>that he wold sometimes want terseness</i> Maybe at first. But afjttmab-5/12/2002
12858<i>So I think the "norm" depends entirely on who is "in&quoLazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12857<i> Would God want jla for company? One-liner, after one-liner. </i>Lazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12856<i>Which group?</i> Seek here and ye shall find your answer: ...&J. C. Dithers-5/12/2002
12855tsk. This critique is hardly representative of my behavior. <i>"Thatone_less-5/12/2002
12854<i>"You previously defined perfect charity as an act; now you are defone_less-5/12/2002
12853<i>jttmab?! Did I pronounce that correctly?!</i> Pretty close. The jttmab-5/12/2002
12852<i>"whodunit?" hunts are the norm.</i> I think that depenJ. C. Dithers-5/12/2002
12851Charley, we recently discussed my account of what Friedman had to say on TV. WeLane3-5/12/2002
12850Nothing terribly unusual here, JC. When someone is suspended and it is not knowLazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12849Maybe we should get Karma back. It seems to be the only thing we can agree on. Lazarus_Long-5/12/2002
12848<i>"Would you like a hanky?</i>" Thanks, but I'll jusSolon-5/12/2002
12847<i>it "could" involve some incidiousness in the process. </iTigerPaw-5/12/2002
12846<i>"Miss Cleo" should have seen it coming.</i>"!! LOSolon-5/12/2002
12845Actually, there was a thread called "questions only", wasn't thereSolon-5/12/2002
12844Miss Cleo. <i>Psychic hot-line?? </i> Yes, cbsnews.com <i>seTigerPaw-5/12/2002
12843Whew! 15 questions in that post of yours Solon. Wonder if that's a thread orjttmab-5/12/2002
12842<i>What is it you are trying so hard not to say? </i> Since you askJ. C. Dithers-5/12/2002
12841I can trust you. Thanks for the correction.Bill-5/12/2002
12840<i>"Charity is an attribute of an act</i>" So which act wSolon-5/12/2002
12839Sometimes metaphors and parallelisms are good things and illustrate philosophicajttmab-5/12/2002
12838<i>God views us as better than nothing.</i> LOL. I would imagine nojttmab-5/12/2002
12837Another side step Dithers. What is it you are trying so hard not to say?one_less-5/12/2002
12836And?.....jttmab-5/12/2002
12835<i>That was a really nice, and thorough, post on Jefferson and Hemings. Thjttmab-5/12/2002
12834But physics and science in general do not proceed by analogy; that is much too Lazarus_Long-5/11/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):