SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
HWP -- Hewlett Packard
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4722 63 0 HPQ
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3880Jerome, Please look at the following link, it shows who is on the board of direBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3879"Active" has a pretty specific meaning. They can't take a seat onBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3878And yet another view: <i>But clearly, Hackborn's move breathes new liElwood P. Dowd-12/14/2001
3877Elwood, <I>HWP cannot afford to lose the Board of Directors and CEO. It wDave B-12/14/2001
3876Dave...lets see who is left on the BOD and what executives leave with Carly.... Jerome-12/14/2001
3875>>>They never were given the opportunity to comment on the proposal earJerome-12/14/2001
3874Some interesting observations: You'd have to be a subscriber to Realmoney.cBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3873Jerome, <I>As Duke pointed out "passive means passive"....creatDave B-12/14/2001
3872My view is that HWP has the much better ongoing income picture. The printing buBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3871Dear Jerome, You should really get your facts straight. The Packard FoundationBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3870Neither foundation has representation on the board. Walter Hewlett has enough sBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3869Passive means not involved in ongoing management. Which is why neither of the fBelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3868The Capellas strategy..... A review of background of Mike Capellas is pretty imJerome-12/14/2001
3867Right, go tell that to Dodge/Chrysler.William Partmann-12/14/2001
3866>> I would be interested to know from any accounting posters as to which cUncle Frank-12/14/2001
3865Uncle Frank...that is bad journalism.... Lisa Gill is just repeating what has bJerome-12/14/2001
3864Uncle Frank...absolutely no apologies are needed today or any other day. All thJerome-12/14/2001
3863Jerome, in my last post to you, I shot from the hip and commented that, "&Uncle Frank-12/14/2001
3862Friday December 14 01:25 PM EST Life Without HP: Could Compaq Survive? By Lisa GUncle Frank-12/14/2001
3861>> Lets be honest Bill, the real bag of worms is the relationship between Uncle Frank-12/14/2001
3860>>>. HP in turn inherits a can of worms with no easy way to integrate iJerome-12/14/2001
3859William Partmann, If you vote for the merger, the Compaq "can do" cultNight Writer-12/14/2001
3858when u classify the HP foundations as 'spoilt rich kids', u are only exhkumar-12/14/2001
3857Interesting argument.The Duke of URL©-12/14/2001
3856Good point.The Duke of URL©-12/14/2001
3855Elwood, hell you own cpq, of course you want the merger to happen. It's bWilliam Partmann-12/14/2001
3854UF: The following is the response I posted to the critter at The Zoo. <i>Elwood P. Dowd-12/14/2001
3853>> This guy at The Zoo reflects my opinion Elwood, you sure picked a straUncle Frank-12/14/2001
3852>>>taking the matter seriously enough to hire outside consultants to reJerome-12/14/2001
3851Interesting. If a passive role is required to remain tax exempt, then would notKirk ©-12/14/2001
3850This guy at The Zoo reflects my opinion: <i>Re: HP-Compaq rift widens bElwood P. Dowd-12/14/2001
3849This guy at The Zoo reflects my opinion: <i>Re: HP-Compaq rift widens bElwood P. Dowd-12/14/2001
3848Dave, B. this country has got a lot of great foundations, Carnegie, Ford, RockeJerome-12/14/2001
3847RE <I>Either way the foundation should stick to being a foundation and leKirk ©-12/14/2001
3846Duke, <i>Ya know, and I'm just noodlin' here, but since your goinDave B-12/14/2001
3845I don't think you understand. I'm not rooting for the merger. I are roNight Writer-12/14/2001
3844Ya know, and I'm just noodlin' here, but since your going to be on the BThe Duke of URL©-12/14/2001
3843Jerome, <i>Foundations should stick to the business of being a foundationDave B-12/14/2001
3842Foundations should stick to the business of being a foundation. If any of thoseJerome-12/14/2001
3841<i>spoiled rich kids</i> Ahh, the sour grape whining of a CPQ shareOeconomicus-12/14/2001
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):