INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)

An SI Board Since April 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
5102	19	0	INPR

Emcee: Kashish King	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
4777	I hate it but I do agree with you that we will end up having to pay off Cowplan	atvcb	-	3/24/2000
4776	FWIW, the OSC charges have been around longer than any discussion of Inprise/Co	Picanoc	-	3/23/2000
4775	the canadian SEC is charging the CEO of Corel with "fraud" insider tr	jean1057	-	3/23/2000
4774	How could they have signed a deal without putting a cap on what Corel's sha	TTOSBT	-	3/23/2000
4773	25% is still plenty of bloc investors capable of rejecting the deal, so I have	Picanoc	-	3/23/2000
4772	It's hard to believe that this whole mess with Corel isn't a really bad	Lewis Edinburg	-	3/23/2000
4771	<<If what Corel says about earnings is true>> Don't you think	Bradley W. Price	-	3/23/2000
4770	I sure wish I'd have had the wisdom to bail out at $14. I have dumped most	David E. Fitzpatrick	-	3/23/2000
4769	Ian, Inprise has a significant institutional ownership compared to Corel. Merr	Dennis Nicks	-	3/23/2000
4768	What is (was?) the level of institutional ownership of INPR? I have only follo	Picanoc	-	3/23/2000
4767	Re: <i>" I still wonder how an intelligent (or not) person could fal	TTOSBT	-	3/23/2000
4766	<i>say, "Hey, let's start all over. Give me another chance."	max	-	3/23/2000
4765	I'm out... If what Corel says about earnings is true, and this company sta	Peter H. Mack	-	3/23/2000
4764	You are right. I think the credibility of INPR management is gone. If the deal	Maher Sid-Ahmed	-	3/23/2000
4763	I would argue that playing this name change game provided nothing of substance	John Solder	-	3/23/2000
4762	<i>You say "Dale and the entire leadership of INPR is brain dead IMO	Bipin Prasad	-	3/23/2000
4761	You say "Dale and the entire leadership of INPR is brain dead IMO" an	Ghassan I. Ghandour	-	3/23/2000
4760	In our case, no. The techno-visionary dealmaker Fuller and the sweetheart B	atvcb	-	3/22/2000
4759	Do the CEO and/or BOD have any fiduciary responsibilities to the shareholders?	Carolyn	-	3/22/2000
4758	David, the trading today was really interesting. Prior to today, there was a f	Dennis Nicks	-	3/22/2000
4757	I think that having a temporary mgt vacuum (after the deal gets trashed and hop	atvcb	-	3/22/2000
4756	If the deal were voted down, which it should be, WS will look at the BOD and le	John Solder	-	3/22/2000
4755	Fuller had already stated he would resign if the merger weren't approved.	dana ingram	-	3/22/2000
4754	I believe that they were hoping that the deal would be viewed favorably by bein	David R	-	3/22/2000
4753	<i> If this were the Titanic, and the BOD we	Magic212	-	3/22/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):