SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTC
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
990 16 0 INTC
Emcee:  Jules B. Garfunkel Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
615 Harry: <i> my mistake was underestimating Intel's sales growth. We aBarry Grossman-7/24/1997
614 Lawrence: First, thanx for your very well-reasoned post. Like many of my fellHarry Landsiedel-7/24/1997
613 Come on, Dave, past performance is no guarantee of future results. If we'rFrodo Baxter-7/23/1997
612 Lawrence, re: QNTM as a better investment than INTC. Let's see, QNTM has mDave Budde-7/23/1997
611 I have no idea when the right time to buy is. So my strategy has always been tDave Budde-7/23/1997
610 Aaron - Re: " but if it is not, then the required fall in price could be mPaul Engel-7/23/1997
609 Anyone selling or shorting INTC because it is trading at a "historically&qMichael Young-7/23/1997
608 Paul - Re: "you will have to wait for Intel to DROP by 40% just to break Aaron Cooperband-7/23/1997
607 Re: "Never ever ever sell Intel" That was a good thing to figure outJon Klaus-7/23/1997
606 >Where can you find a better investment? QNTMFrodo Baxter-7/23/1997
605 Ken, re: ">Do you have any that cost 2 cents since your average is 50 cDave Budde-7/23/1997
604 DAVE<<<My two cents:>>>>>Do you have any that cost 2 ceKENNETH R SANDERS-7/23/1997
603 Lawrence = Re: "Do you disagree substantively with my short-term doubts abPaul Engel-7/23/1997
602 My two cents: After having bought and sold Intel for the last 23 years I have Dave Budde-7/23/1997
601 lawrence, you bring up valid points for selling Intel now. But, they can easilJoey Smith-7/23/1997
600 Lawrence, It pleases me to read your very well thought out post. Getting us toJules B. Garfunkel-7/23/1997
599 Hi Lawrence, Interesting commentry... on the valuation side, you are absolutelRichard Forsythe-7/23/1997
598 Lawrence, I would like to make one point. Your good arguments are based on curRoad Walker-7/23/1997
597 Paul, of course you are correct. I wonder too about the traders that seem to poFrodo Baxter-7/23/1997
596 Paul, Lawrence - it's actually even worse after buying back the shares atAnthony Ettipio-7/23/1997
595 Lawrence - From a simple tax standpoint,let me address this issue. Current capPaul Engel-7/23/1997
594 Having recently sold the majority of my Intel stake, I feel the need to justifyFrodo Baxter-7/23/1997
593 Jules. ""Thank you for providing us with this excellent link, (ggg)&Harry Landsiedel-7/21/1997
592 Thomas, I am in a similar position as you and couldn't resist commenting onTom Pulley-7/21/1997
591 Hi Harry, Thank you for providing us with this excellent link, (ggg) For a revJules B. Garfunkel-7/21/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News