SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
840 98 0 QQQ
Emcee:  M CAHILL Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
765I definitely soiled my shorts today, and will probably do so again tomorrow!! WeOuter-limits-6/20/2002
764Hi Savant, I don't know if this graph will offer any comfort, but at least IOldAIMGuy-6/20/2002
763re: business radio say they've covered their shorts. It's so bad, wondBill Ounce-6/20/2002
762Not sure where this market is heading. I've heard a few hedge managers on buOuter-limits-6/19/2002
761Over the last four trading days, we've witnessed one massive pump and dump..Savant-6/19/2002
760All day long the Goombahs they've been bringing on CNBC think that no one wiOuter-limits-6/7/2002
759LT trend line. There could be some debate as to where that line is. As I mentionSavant-6/7/2002
758A very good technical analyst was on CNBC about 45 minutes ago. He said the DAQ Outer-limits-6/7/2002
757OT: Thanks, Steve. That is exactly my point. It troubles me that, during my liFred Gohlke-6/7/2002
756Laws. <i> "My initial comment was: 'It seems strange to me that,riposte-6/6/2002
755QQQ--I'm still awaiting the intersection of the Nas Comp twenty year trend lSavant-6/4/2002
754Savant, I agree with you. You are right on every count. 1) Some artists profitFred Gohlke-6/4/2002
753OT-I've a friend that is a copyright lawyer. Not all cases are similar. SomeSavant-6/4/2002
752[OT] Thanks, Steve. I appreciate your comments. When you say, "I've nFred Gohlke-6/4/2002
751Copyright Protection <<< <i> 1) In what way is the extension of riposte-6/3/2002
750Hi Fred, .....<i>inflicted on us by corporations without sanction by our gOldAIMGuy-6/3/2002
749OT: Thanks for reminding us of the classics, Tom. However, restricting one'Fred Gohlke-6/3/2002
748<OT> Not to barge in on this discussion, BUT....... <g> In one way OldAIMGuy-6/3/2002
747Oh, dear. The insurance police will be over to get you. They'll probably cFred Gohlke-6/3/2002
746OT-Ah'Greed'-no it has not a simple solution. The penalty is imposed upSavant-6/3/2002
745Savant, I am a capitalist, born and bred. Capitalism has allowed me to pursue mFred Gohlke-6/3/2002
744OT-NYTimes Sunday ed.,has an article proposing the theory that white collar crimSavant-6/3/2002
743I appreciate your perspective. It is, I think, pretty much the common view. YoFred Gohlke-6/3/2002
742"understanding how our laws foster and reward it."..My understanding, Savant-6/2/2002
741It seems strange to me that, although there is no shortage of people to complainFred Gohlke-6/2/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News