SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16033<i>Eyes roll on Fox News when the word Liberal is mentioned, but it is no Lane3-6/29/2002
16032<i>It would have been fleshed out a little by now had anyone offered any fLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16031<i>BTW, your English is fine and you know it and I know it. The statement Lane3-6/29/2002
16030Yup. Let's hope the full 9th decides to review and reverses.Lazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16029Gotta look at this. I MUST be wrong! :-)Lazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16028I know that what you want to do. But you are framing it in a way that pulls uponNeocon-6/29/2002
16027Although I tend to agree that she may no longer be a threat to society, the reasConstant Reader-6/29/2002
16026Mirabilis dictu, I agree completely with this post of yours! (I must reconsideE-6/29/2002
16025<i>From my point of view there's so much weaseling in there, it's Lane3-6/29/2002
16024<i> Is Fox News bothers you, change channels. </i> See. That'sLane3-6/29/2002
16023I'll take the status quo over that any day. And if you can't see the difConstant Reader-6/29/2002
16022Eyes roll on Fox News when the word Liberal is mentioned, but it is no concern oConstant Reader-6/29/2002
16021We can't dictate what other people think or mean. That is a personal choice.Constant Reader-6/29/2002
16020<i>I take it you have no objection, then, to efforts to have a moment of sLane3-6/29/2002
16019<i>That may be, except you appear to be setting yourself up as arbiter of Lane3-6/29/2002
16018<i>You are the one who keeps proposing alternatives to the status quo, whiLane3-6/29/2002
16017<i>Persistent criminals are kept from society via death, incarceration, orLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16016<i>If the jury and/or judge doesn't buy it, make an appeal for gubernaLane3-6/29/2002
16015So, do you want to tally up eyerolls on the various networks? Is Fox News botheMichael M-6/29/2002
16014Did I say it was?Michael M-6/29/2002
16013Fastest way I know to insure the passage of a constitutional amendment endorsingConstant Reader-6/29/2002
16012I'm talking about the court case and its aftermath- -more suits, legislativeLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16011<i>Methinks you may be fishing for an unChristian expression </i> NLane3-6/29/2002
16010Ah, yes, this was a 3-judge bench, so the full Circuit could reverse. The SupreLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16009I take it you have no objection, then, to efforts to have a moment of silence atConstant Reader-6/29/2002
16008I understand and share your aversion to law suits. I've never sued anyone fLane3-6/29/2002
16007YES! THAT! I know it means you law dogs will have to find an honest way to mLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16006That may be, except you appear to be setting yourself up as arbiter of what consConstant Reader-6/29/2002
16005I hate to be the one to give you the bad news, but the United States is not a diLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
16004The current policy. You are the one who keeps bringing up extraneous issues and Constant Reader-6/29/2002
16003Anarchy rocks, eh?Michael M-6/29/2002
16002<i>Perhaps practicality should be considered here. </i> NO! Not THOriginal Mad Dog-6/29/2002
16001<i>You're gonna lose this one.</i> If you're talking about Lane3-6/29/2002
16000Actually, my primary reference was to "exile" as a form of punishment:Neocon-6/29/2002
15999Unless the members of the Supreme Court start dropping like flies between now anConstant Reader-6/29/2002
15998The last thing we need is an "official" understanding of God. Now THAMichael M-6/29/2002
15997If one thinks oneself to be justified, or to be so over- wrought as to diminish Neocon-6/29/2002
15996Methinks you may be fishing for an unChristian expression from one you may be asMichael M-6/29/2002
15995And it's hardly always a good thing either. It has slowed or prevented adapLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15994<i>I did not, in fact, make much of punishment as deterrence</i> MeLane3-6/29/2002
15993<i>Given the near-unanimous response to the revival of this issue, I see nLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15992I don't agree that atheists are unceremoniously dissed and treated as alien.Michael M-6/29/2002
15991<i>Your unwillingness to accept what has been a viable policy for over halLane3-6/29/2002
15990Perhaps practicality should be considered here. You and I are heavily outnumberLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15989I did not, in fact, make much of punishment as deterrence. My point all along haNeocon-6/29/2002
15988I have no problem with the idea of including restitution as an aspect of sentencNeocon-6/29/2002
15987I'm sorry, Neo, I just realized I left the attachment off the post you respoLane3-6/29/2002
15986Your unwillingness to accept what has been a viable policy for over half a centuConstant Reader-6/29/2002
15985Yes, there was malice, in the ordinary sense, or she would have exhausted all soNeocon-6/29/2002
15984<i>Only people who resemble those looking under beds for Communists can seLane3-6/29/2002
15983Given the near-unanimous response to the revival of this issue, I see no reason Constant Reader-6/29/2002
15982<i>I'm afraid your idea of a "win-win" is the majority'sLane3-6/29/2002
15981Social pressure to conform ain't always a bad thing. It is the foundation oMichael M-6/29/2002
15980I'm afraid your idea of a "win-win" is the majority's idea of Michael M-6/29/2002
15979<i>Oh. Why didn't you say that earlier? </i> Some days I donLane3-6/29/2002
15978<i>Only people who resemble those looking under beds for Communists can seLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15977<i>Most likely, a life outside of society under control of the system makiLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15976<i> I went entirely to public schools and I turned out....</i> WelLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15975It seems to me that the consequences are commensurate with the mistake in judgmeConstant Reader-6/29/2002
15974In that case, they found a win-win for this particular question almost 60 years Constant Reader-6/29/2002
15973<i>What were the attitudes they let fester?</i> The attitude is thaLane3-6/29/2002
15972<i>Yes, it does. It makes the victim feel avenged. You may not like that, Lane3-6/29/2002
15971<i>There is also the fact that the matter is still under review by the couLane3-6/29/2002
15970<i>We should be looking at deterrence, which is the object, rather than puLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15969Who were the good people? What were the attitudes they let fester? What was thMichael M-6/29/2002
15968Hard to say. Some military flight proficiency training requires flying very cloMichael M-6/29/2002
15967<i>WHY is it not sufficient that punishment of the criminal deter others eLane3-6/29/2002
15966All I was doing was pointing out that the answer you get on a poll about the dp E-6/29/2002
15965Yes, ironic. And then there's the irony of inserting that language to distiLane3-6/29/2002
15964Spam is extremely popular in Samoa.Michael M-6/29/2002
15963"All of us serve a purpose, some of us as bad examples." WHY is it noLazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15962I believe I already told you why. To repeat - political suicide. There is alsoMichael M-6/29/2002
15961<b>How the Pledge got God</b> post-gazette.com The local rag pickedWin Smith-6/29/2002
15960<i>If that's the case, things have changed since I went to school.<Lazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15959huh?Poet-6/29/2002
15958I will consider your example further.....Neocon-6/29/2002
15957I will mull it over, and see if we can find a greater area of agreement.....Neocon-6/29/2002
15956poetryPaul Corbett-6/29/2002
15955<i>This result could have clearly been avoided by avoiding the ridiculous Lane3-6/29/2002
15954LOL! Bull-oney.... This result could have clearly been avoided by avoiding thejlallen-6/29/2002
15953The demolib pinhead threw the first stone. Those non-demolib pinheads who are pLane3-6/29/2002
15952This is what happens when demolib pinheads make mountains out of molehills.... jlallen-6/29/2002
15951<i>What an enormous waste of time and money by those who seek to divide usLane3-6/29/2002
15950Here's the kind of scenario I had in mind when I invented the woman who killLane3-6/29/2002
15949Hanging is another option....<g>jlallen-6/29/2002
15948<i>How would you feel if your kids were required or expected to announce tjlallen-6/29/2002
15947<i>The pilot that clipped the Italian cable car was sentenced to six monthDayuhan-6/29/2002
15946<i>I think that there is a penitential aspect of punishment, as a way of dLane3-6/29/2002
15945SPAMPoet-6/29/2002
15944I am not very concerned with immediate effects, but with the long term effects oNeocon-6/29/2002
15943LOL. And Amy Fisher is a columnist. And the actress from NYPD Blue had her turLane3-6/29/2002
15942<i>that is, actual malice--- the intentional infliction of harm or deliberLane3-6/29/2002
15941"Survivor" player spent an entire week learning how to be a reporter Tom Clarke-6/29/2002
15940In civil actions, one can be held liable without the full burden of guilt, that Neocon-6/29/2002
15939<i> It would please no one (except maybe a couple of people on SI) and makLane3-6/29/2002
15938$$ Al Qaeda July 4 terrorist Attack certain$$ consider this 1) 90% of al QaedaPaul Corbett-6/29/2002
15937<i>citizens are not REQUIRED to say the pledge.</i> If that's tDayuhan-6/29/2002
15936<i>I don't believe in affirmative action, abortion and a host of otherDayuhan-6/29/2002
15935And just what would the restitution be for intentionally killing someone else? Lazarus_Long-6/29/2002
15934The pilot that clipped the Italian cable car was sentenced to six months. <baverage joe-6/29/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):