Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)

An SI Board Since May 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
19079	388	0	ORCL

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
17804	I think that a trend is developing of Henley selling. There are two big sales by	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/11/2003
17803	Not that history is bad to look at, but taking a look too far back really can	MeDroogies	-	1/11/2003
17802	Maybe a trend is developing with insider selling.	Qualified Opinion	-	1/11/2003
17801	Oracle CFO Henley Sold 1 Million Shares Acquired From Options By Laura Smitherma	Qualified Opinion	-	1/11/2003
17800	<i>Perhaps you need more than three days time to understand what sharehold	Lizzie Tudor	-	1/10/2003
17799	Okay, I apologize for the meaningless remark -- it wasn't my intent to be in	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/10/2003
17798	Actually I knew what "shareholder's equity" on a balance sheet mea	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/10/2003
17797	Hardly: Please let me belatedly edit my last post and apologize for its tone.	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17796	-	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17795	<i>It's meaningless to talk of Ellison's payday if the company wer	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17794	It's meaningless to talk of Ellison's payday if the company were private	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/10/2003
17793	<i>Many analysts, investors, and accountants think ORCL is one of the more	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17792	<i>If I had held Oracle stock since 1991, I would have been even less like	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17791	Telling the tax man one thing and shareholders another is a consequence of the t	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/10/2003
17790	I agree with you about the lack of transparency regarding options, in general.	MeDroogies	-	1/10/2003
17789	Yeah, sure...what do you know? (just kidding, I agree it's been very intere	MeDroogies	-	1/10/2003
17788	I just wanted to chime in to mention that I greatly appreciate the informative d	James Ballentine	-	1/10/2003
17787	Dividends Like you, I am in favor of the rule changes regarding dividends. How	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17786	<i> I also think that blaming companies that use stock options for the tax	hueyone	-	1/10/2003
17785	I agree that making option expenses clearer is reasonable, and so does the Oracl	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/10/2003
17784	<i>Well, I don't think that there is anything that covert about it.<	hueyone	-	1/9/2003
17783	I agree 100%. Anyone opposed to the use of options is really just not in touch	MeDroogies	-	1/9/2003
17782	Well, a technically bullish development is occuring with Oracle right now, so th	SouthFloridaGuy	-	1/9/2003
17781	Well, I don't think that there is anything that covert about it. After all,	Hardly B. Solipsist	-	1/9/2003
17780	Yes Brushwud already corrected me stating that "retained earnings" are	hueyone	-	1/9/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):