SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
FONR...Patent on Cancer Detection....
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
560 1 0
Emcee:  Hunter Vann Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
385 Luis: you must use TA. I think TA is like the ancient shaman throwing knuckle Adelantado-3/19/1997
384 I agree with you Joe, however I did not explain myself.. so used to seeing charluis a. garcia-3/19/1997
383 I'd rather see an uptrend than a spike, which, to me implies only a fleetinAdelantado-3/19/1997
382 William/guys I like the chart very much, I think we should see another spike uluis a. garcia-3/18/1997
381 NEWS: aniel Culver wrote: > > FONAR CORPORATION > 110 Marcus Dr., MeWilliam Macko-3/16/1997
380 David, we will have to see how this varies from the original MAO techniques. James L. Fleckenstein-3/14/1997
379 Bones, I'm hoping you get much more information from Fonar on the capabilitRob Wachowsky-3/14/1997
378 MKEL and Luis, the sales agreement with NIR stipulates a minimum of 30 orders wRob Wachowsky-3/14/1997
377 I think you will find that Fonar stands alone above 0.3T in resistive design; IJames L. Fleckenstein-3/14/1997
376 Thanks, now I can go back in my notes and see who competes with Fonar in the NodaveG-3/14/1997
375 Super cons traditionally required liquid helium and liquid nitrogen to keep theJames L. Fleckenstein-3/14/1997
374 MAO is not related to magnet design although the nuances may be related to it. James L. Fleckenstein-3/14/1997
373 Can anybody give me insight into the pros and cons of superconducting Vs non- sdaveG-3/14/1997
372 Thanks for your info Dr. Appreciated. I will be most interested in your upcomJim Reome-3/14/1997
371 Yes I am getting more aquainted with this investment. In an investment there arluis a. garcia-3/14/1997
370 I have a call into Siemens to verify that they own Oxford. However, I am not sJames L. Fleckenstein-3/14/1997
369 luis, have you found the beef yet?daveG-3/14/1997
368 Hi Dave I have not been able to verify that Seimens bought Oxford. It could bJim Reome-3/14/1997
367 No, it tracks because the pr person mentions the base price and we know nobody luis a. garcia-3/14/1997
366 I would call your attention to the fact that the sales agreement with NIR is ondaveG-3/14/1997
365 Luis, Looking at the future revenues, The sales agreement with the NIR dealerMKEL-3/14/1997
364 Hi Jim, I have followed your posts and do feel that in large part it is do to ydaveG-3/14/1997
363 Hi Dave: I agree with your thoughts. If Fonars magnets are what we think theyJim Reome-3/14/1997
362 I see a problem with a Siemens friendly Fonar and that is that Dr. FleckensteindaveG-3/14/1997
361 It would be nice if this was the way it got played out Dick. I believe that FoJim Reome-3/14/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News