SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Ross Technology? Let's talk!
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
475 2 0 RTEC
Emcee:  Mark T. Heath Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
400 I'm a new investor,I can't seem to find any "NEW" news. Wouldmikecat-3/26/1997
399 I for one would love to be optimistic about rtec but they haven't exactly gj bayer-3/25/1997
398 Is this the same Ross Technology that is listed in the top 20 Small Cap picks fDavid Eugene Harvey-3/24/1997
397 Depends on how much you paid for it. MarkMark Oliver-3/22/1997
396 Got a poster today from ROSS, is this a buy signal?BAXTERBOO-3/22/1997
395 You said... ..... P.S.: In regards of the debts: I think RTEC would not survivePeter H. Mack-3/13/1997
394 Butch, Why would Sun dump their stock? They have nothing to gain but a tax loscott maragioglio-3/13/1997
393 Hi Scott I have been following RTEC for about a year and just recently startedbutch dowdy-3/13/1997
392 Peter: good question ! I liked this one: => What is SUN going to do in the mStefan Habermayer-3/13/1997
391 A possible scenario could be to sit down and restructure around the best prospePeter H. Mack-3/13/1997
390 Scott: I think, that's right in your last post. => Loose everything or wStefan Habermayer-3/13/1997
389 Stefan, Everyone asking about what Fujitsu even wants with Ross and why even scott maragioglio-3/13/1997
388 Mark, I've been following the situation very closely over the past few montscott maragioglio-3/13/1997
387 Well, I am just reading your last post: " ... ok, why would fujitsu have Stefan Habermayer-3/13/1997
386 Mark, thanks for your mail from the last time This is how I see the things (I mStefan Habermayer-3/13/1997
385 Stefan, glad to keep to hear you're enjoying my postings. You're rightMark Oliver-3/12/1997
384 ok, why would fujitsu have helped finance the last "infusion" of fundj bayer-3/12/1997
383 Mark,you are a funny guy. Your postings are better than Comedy Channel I haveStefan Habermayer-3/12/1997
382 Can anyone explain the recent rash of selling of RTEC. My heart sank as I starShawn-3/12/1997
381 Scott, I haven't seen a post from you in a while. What do you think of allMark Oliver-3/11/1997
380 Peter, I think Ross's ability to get production going has never been in douMark Oliver-3/11/1997
379 << I think there are several points worth noting. They mention big volumePeter Bernhardt-3/11/1997
378 Peter, here's an article from Electronic Engineering Times that pretty wellMark Oliver-3/10/1997
377 << It may be a quarter or two before some significant profitablity is eviPeter Bernhardt-3/9/1997
376 John: I agree fully. Mr. May answered candidly and held back little if anythBarry Siegel-3/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News