SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9343 Flatsville, Thanks for that report. I'm heartened to hear that at leaHawkmoon-12/4/1999
9342 <i>Maybe you need a refresher course in Freedom 101.</i> Yeah righHawkmoon-12/4/1999
9341 Well Ron, you've convinced us that indeed, you're a law and order kind Fred Ragan-12/4/1999
9340 Mark... My point exactly. The demonstration/protest was rendered useless byHawkmoon-12/4/1999
9339 Mark-- I saw that coverage of the "ananrchists" by the T.V reporter flatsville-12/4/1999
9338 Ron, The one point that I would like to make and that would be missed by anyonJBTFD-12/4/1999
9337 <i>My job is not to say how this job should have been done, my job is to Hawkmoon-12/4/1999
9336 Interesting Rose... I have this "Jesus/Apocalypse@Y2Koral thing going&quoHawkmoon-12/4/1999
9335 Sounds like we're going to be reading about you one of these days Rose.. MHawkmoon-12/4/1999
9334 Mark.. Thank you for your response on this question of what should have been Hawkmoon-12/4/1999
9333 Bad judgement? Possibly.. But lord knows that most police forces actually spHawkmoon-12/4/1999
9332 Mark wrote: <i>Ron: Many of your statements are not applicable to whatIngotWeTrust-12/3/1999
9331 Ron, Many of your statements are not applicable to what's going on in SeatJBTFD-12/3/1999
9330 <<<I'm still waiting for you to tell us how this matter should haJBTFD-12/3/1999
9329 <<Obfuscation can be an art form. You're actually good at it.>>JBTFD-12/3/1999
9328 Yes Rose, it may very well happen that way. If it does it is a grave misfortuFred Ragan-12/3/1999
9327 I'm certain, Fred, Y2K Chaos will show just how many more of THEM there areIngotWeTrust-12/3/1999
9326 My dear fellow, Let me clear up some of your illusion; My job is not to say hFred Ragan-12/3/1999
9325 49r, I find the color and texture of your prose quite vivid and clever, but somLane3-12/3/1999
9324 Retract what exactly,.. Freddie, my boy?? It is obvious that the Posse ComitatHawkmoon-12/3/1999
9323 <<< It seems that before that period, the time of our founding fatherFred Ragan-12/3/1999
9322 Hmmm... I guess you are a kindred spirit with 'ol 49r... more apt to criticHawkmoon-12/3/1999
9321 and around and around and around... Obfuscation can be an art form. You'rFred Ragan-12/3/1999
9320 <i>It does <b>NOT</b> permit them to engage in law enforcemenHawkmoon-12/3/1999
9319 One of your many problems Rose is that you like to incessantly b*tch and moan aHawkmoon-12/3/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):