|  | 
|  |  | 
| We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level. | 
|   
 
    
    
    
American automobile companies had a lot of bagage to carry, mostly fringe benefit obligations that they are trying to shed. they have some success, but not enough to save them from natinalization by the federal government. It started out with undeciplined acquisition of foreign troubled car compamies. Owning 30-50% of foreign car companies, you have to run them for profits in host countries. Never do it in america to compete with yourselves. Cheap labor will be too much competition to cut into US market shares in America. Toyota owned by GM is a good example of lost market shares. Mazda for Ford is a good example but not as bad. Profits made in Japan did not help US car companies to stay solvent. We have to consider nationizing these two companies to run them profitably. We will discuss technologies needed at the dealership; and technology used in manufacturing cars in the US. Any improvements here will make nationalization un-necessary, if successful. | ||||||||||||
| 
 
 | 
| Home | Hot | SubjectMarks | PeopleMarks | Keepers | Settings | 
| Terms Of Use | Contact Us | Copyright/IP Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | FAQ | Advertise on SI | 
| © 2025 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News |