SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
OnSale Inc.
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4903 22 0 ONSL
Emcee:  Mike Magarahan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3803 I agree with your statement that flame wars are totally counter-productive and zurdo-3/3/1999
3802 <<You present very few hard facts..mostly subjective opinion on how you j_b-3/3/1999
3801 >>Also I will do the typical thing and not recommend them to friends anyAlienTech-3/3/1999
3800 Mark, I've just tried to tell it as honestly and truthfully as possible. Jim Johnson-3/3/1999
3799 Don, Truthfully, I was intending to carry it no further to OnSale. I wasnJim Johnson-3/3/1999
3798 "I just wanted to let you know their customer service finally responded anMark3000-3/3/1999
3797 First, I think you were mixing replies to me,with replies Zurdo's messages.Don Wellington Jr.-3/3/1999
3796 Sorry, Jim...You present very few hard facts..mostly subjective opinion on how zurdo-3/3/1999
3795 Don, Well, the "system" finally worked! OnSale sent me a RMA numberJim Johnson-3/3/1999
3794 zurdo, <<<In the case of ONSL, there are no "many"...just oJim Johnson-3/3/1999
3793 <<The Internet has been known to "bury" a company, if exceptionzurdo-3/2/1999
3792 Don, It was never my intention to "bury" this company, or any other.Jim Johnson-3/1/1999
3791 jb, I posted the entire email reply here. I did try doing a "Return to sJim Johnson-3/1/1999
3790 I agree completely. I did not see your original post, so I "assumed" Don Wellington Jr.-3/1/1999
3789 <<It is just that a form does not cover every situation.>> Absoluj_b-3/1/1999
3788 Hi Jim- Just wanted to let you know that I appreciate your updates on the servAnaxagoras-2/28/1999
3787 jb, I was not looking for an email for a particular person. The contact could Jim Johnson-2/28/1999
3786 I think i will base my investment decision on this ongoing saga. Please post eMark3000-2/27/1999
3785 <<Did I read their email wrong? I didn't see anywhere they said anytj_b-2/27/1999
3784 Don, I said from the start that my purchase was from AtCost....and the URL I pJim Johnson-2/27/1999
3783 jb, Did I read their email wrong? I didn't see anywhere they said anythinJim Johnson-2/27/1999
3782 Ahha, The plot thickens. You purchased from atCost, not atAuction. My dealings Don Wellington Jr.-2/27/1999
3781 << here is their response. As usual, there is no name or phone number or j_b-2/27/1999
3780 Don, The issue was MSOffice..I saw it as advertised as a CD and they sent a liJim Johnson-2/27/1999
3779 Great! Would be curious as to who or what you contacted made the response. But,Don Wellington Jr.-2/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News