SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Asia Forum
An SI Board Since December 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9980 53 0
Emcee:  Thomas Haegin Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8905 Hi Steve, thank you for the article. Yes, it is a good introduction to people wBosco-7/21/1999
8904 Might be of interest to you: iht.comDayuhan-7/21/1999
8903 Hi Larry & all, Larry, you postscripted "P.S. Bosco figures in here, wBosco-7/21/1999
8902 It seems to have provoked some bi-partisan PRO-Taiwanese sentiment in the HouseDMaA-7/21/1999
8901 Steven/Bosco- <i><<The only conclusion I can reach is that Lee wasLiatris Spicata-7/21/1999
8900 All - President Lee must have covered his short positions <VBG>! biz.yahBosco-7/21/1999
8899 Hello Larry - thanks for the NYT piece. I am going to combine my response to boBosco-7/21/1999
8898 Larry, Very interesting article. I am reminded of a comment by my English guiZ268-7/21/1999
8897 G'day all - hi Steve, you sez "... If this is true, guess I'm showBosco-7/21/1999
8896 Bosco- Thought you might like this fascinating historical account (IMO). DanielLiatris Spicata-7/21/1999
8895 Stephen, Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear enough. What I was stating waHawkmoon-7/21/1999
8894 Bosco- <i><< the seed has been sown long before him.>></iLiatris Spicata-7/21/1999
8893 Stephen- I find your comments persuasive. I would not see them constraining thLiatris Spicata-7/21/1999
8892 Ron, "More of what I had in mind was a UN reinforcement of Taiwan, threaZ268-7/21/1999
8891 Steven- <i><<Meanwhile, the harsh rhetoric emerging from the US haLiatris Spicata-7/21/1999
8890 Larry, <<That's because generations of Taiwan residents increasinglZ268-7/21/1999
8889 Stephen- From an article in today's WSJ with the byline of Jessie Wong &lLiatris Spicata-7/21/1999
8888 Hutch - The US cannot do so b/c she is upholding the one China policy. While soBosco-7/20/1999
8887 Steve, Agreed. Lee was making the comments for internal consumption in TaHawkmoon-7/20/1999
8886 I don't really think this is a case of threatening behaviour from Beijing. Dayuhan-7/20/1999
8885 Steve, Massive response was not meant to be interpreted as invading or bomHawkmoon-7/20/1999
8884 <i>Just in case people are not aware of it, the US is bound by treaty to Zardoz-7/20/1999
8883 G'day all again, Ron, you sez "...(were the US not to respond)." Bosco-7/20/1999
8882 I also don't expect a military response to this particular round of verbal Dayuhan-7/20/1999
8881 <i>but would they be willing to go to war with China over it? China wouldHawkmoon-7/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):