2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
2000 Date-Change Problem: Scam, Hype, Hoax, Fraud

An SI Board Since May 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1361	14	0

Emcee: Bill Wexler	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
186	Obviously Bill was frustrated with the limitations of discussion on the various	White Shoes	-	10/6/1997
185	<i>The $600 Billion estimate was apparently derived by one gentleman (I b	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/6/1997
184	Jeff, <i>The Gartner Group, a reputable research organization, said that	David Eddy	-	10/6/1997
183	HH, <i> there is an enormous amount of hyping going on, and I believe mu	David Eddy	-	10/6/1997
182	Stop spamming this thread, hypester.	White Shoes	-	10/6/1997
181	The $600 Billion estimate was apparently derived by one gentleman (I believe Ke	Bill Wexler	-	10/6/1997
180	Embedded Systems: Explanation General non-technical exp	Done, gone.	-	10/6/1997
179	<i>It's not up to the skeptic to counter a claim. It's up to the	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/6/1997
178	The hyping never stops. I am forced to post my comments on VIAS on a sympath	White Shoes	-	10/6/1997
177	Year 2000 Legal Issues Summit	Done, gone.	-	10/6/1997
176	It's not up to the skeptic to counter a claim. It's up to the person m	Bill Wexler	-	10/6/1997
175	YEAR 2000 PROGRESS Miss	Done, gone.	-	10/6/1997
174	Attention New Readers (who found this thread is on the HotTopics list), here ar	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/6/1997
173	Bill, speaking of science and <i>not</i> opinion, as <i>you&l	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	10/6/1997
172	First, I want to say thanks to Bill for creating this thread, because it gives	Hardware Heister	-	10/6/1997
171	Progress on Year 2000 Conversion - U.S. Office of Management and Budget August	Done, gone.	-	10/6/1997
170	Bill, <i>not one addresses the issue of the distinct lack of evidence fo	David Eddy	-	10/6/1997
169	<b>TESTIMONY OF GEORGE MU¥OZ ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE TREAS	Done, gone.	-	10/5/1997
168	Bill, <i> not one addresses the issue of the distinct lack of evidence f	David Eddy	-	10/5/1997
167	Bill, <i>If the Y2K problem is so overwhelming, why haven't we seen	David Eddy	-	10/5/1997
166	<b>Financial Institutions and the Year 2000</b> Federal Financial	Done, gone.	-	10/5/1997
165	<b>Report to the Congress on the Readiness of the United States Securitie	Done, gone.	-	10/5/1997
164	You don't see alot of ads YET because everybody is so far behind that they	Pierre Mondieu	-	10/5/1997
163	Thanks for your post. I have no dopubt that many who are concerned about the Y	Bill Wexler	-	10/5/1997
162	Thank you for the links... ...but this still doesn't help. I have read th	Bill Wexler	-	10/5/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):