SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
General Lithography
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1305 39 0
Emcee:  Andrew Vance Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
380 I will specifically address MASK and one of its customers. MXIM has had phenomeAndrew Vance-6/4/1997
379 Nothing real conclusive but his past few years he SEEMS to be part of some compAndrew Vance-6/4/1997
378 Andrew, Can you look up the MASK's 4th quarter report and comment on it?Jurgis Bekepuris-6/4/1997
377 Andrew: The combinations you listed all make sense. However, if AMAT wants to jJohn Wang-6/3/1997
376 Andrew, do you have any knowledge/opinion of the new guy, Ferran, that SUBM jusjeffbas-6/2/1997
375 Actually, I believe AMAT is going to debut a lithography system in July, at SemAndrew Vance-6/2/1997
374 Re: Andrew "I believe somewhere in Germany there is an operational factorJames Word-5/31/1997
373 Ian: If there is anyone who may want to buy up SVGL, I think that AMAT may be tJohn Wang-5/31/1997
372 <Synchrotron rings are expensive for initial investment. This is the smallesAndrew Vance-5/30/1997
371 Ian Actually, X-Ray steppers are nothing new. In fact, I believe IBM built an James Word-5/29/1997
370 Andrew, Interesting story about SVGI giving IBM a working X-Ray stepper. I Ian@SI-5/29/1997
369 Yousef, I'd love to see INTC start a bidding war for SVGI. However, I thiIan@SI-5/29/1997
368 Ian, Re: "He didn't believe vertical integration was a formula for suYousef-5/29/1997
367 Juniper, My understanding is exactly like yours in that Intel has spent countlYousef-5/29/1997
366 J, Re: "<i>A takeover by Intel would surprise me since it's notIan@SI-5/28/1997
365 Andrew, this is Kent over in the FSI -The Worst is Over? Thread. I remember reaKent Sarikaya-5/28/1997
364 Could you explain that Intel has been dissatisfied with SVGL scanners? I wasn&Juniper-5/28/1997
363 Bob, I just saw this news article about the possibility of Intel or Hitachi buYousef-5/28/1997
362 Hello Bob: I think that SVGI will eventually go up with the group. I consideJohn Wang-5/27/1997
361 Hello John, From reading your post and looking at your profile its I see you hFJB-5/26/1997
360 Ritz, Andrew: Resolution is inversely proportional to NA. But, DOF is inverselJohn Wang-5/26/1997
359 ETEC deals into a different market than the stepper companies you mentioned. ETAndrew Vance-5/23/1997
358 Andrew, I am not a technical person, but like to invest in tech stocks. Sometimjeffbas-5/23/1997
357 Andrew, I have no specific info regarding to the patent in your post. I am suYousef-5/22/1997
356 Yousef-what is your take on the patent issue relative to the step and scan systAndrew Vance-5/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):