To: golden_tee who wrote (10084 ) 4/1/1999 11:08:00 PM From: Zeev Hed Respond to of 27311
Robert, you are distorting history, my first comment on MVIS was a comparative study of the Altman factors (MVIS won hands down vs VLNC), then the gentleman who asked for a critical Altman analysis, asked that I look at the portofolio of patents MVIS has (a similar request was posted on this thread few months back), after searching in vain for patents assigned to the "right" MVIS, I informed the gentleman of my futile efforts, then he tells me they were originally assigned to Washington University (or close to it), and gave me few URL's. I looked at two of them and suffered severe convulsions (VLNC wins hands down), then the gentleman informed me that I am arrogant and he does not want to play anymore, which is fine with me. Oh, He also unbookmarked me, the most severe punishment, I presume, an SI poster can suffer, well, second to being reported to Jill and banned (VBG), that is the history. The funny thing is that currently I feel that MVIS has a pretty good chance of reaching prices somewhat above $24 later this year, so I am bullish on it (which at this time, I cannot say the same about VLNC), for the time being, but when people fall in a love with a stock, they cannot bear reading a single iota of criticism, they do not want to read of possible blemishes, they believe that 50% gross margins are the natural order of things etc.. When you present them with numbers to "massage" a little in order to come up with a rational valuation, the thread falls silent, except few insults here and there. In that respect this and MVIS' threads are not different. That, of course, is "Due Diligence", acting like ostriches. Zeev